Ok, but you are still suggesting that they are making their judgements on something other than the evidence (or lack of it) put before them. Surely you must be joking.
It is telling to me that they have been coming up with these judgements unanimously - despite the “political affiliation” decried by cv - and I shoudn’t think they are all scaredycats. I suppose none of that will deter you from believing all the Trump crap despite the fact that the highest courts in the land are, so far, unconvinced and judge that the significant fraud allegations are wholly without foundation. You keep saying that the evidence is plain to see, but I think they are a tad better placed to determine that than you. Is it at all feasible that you can have the greater insight? I think not.
