timsk
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,611
- Likes
- 3,331
Hi c_v,
Meanwhile, nutters are killing civilians on our streets and the the argument about how to combat the problem is - to a greater or lesser extent - based around resources and funding. Both problems could be sorted in an instant by getting rid of Trident.
Tim.
Needless to say, I disagree! I've never heard any arguments in favour of having nuclear weapons that make even a modicum of sense: they are just nonsense. All of them.Nothing to do with Trident, which may well be a monumental waste of money, but as long as other powers have nukes, then so should we.
Unilateral disarmament arguments are just nonsense. All of them.
Oh, no argument from me on this c_v., I merely used N. Korea as an example of a state that has - or is likely to have - nuclear weapons and mad enough to use them. The point is - we're not (mad enough) - so there's no point having them. And even if we had a PM who was - no possible good could come from it - so there'd be no point deploying them.On North Korea, as far as we are concerned, it is of no consequence to us whatsoever. The situation is not One of UK v N Korea in some kind of nuclear exchange. This is just fantasy thinking. China and the wider region need to monitor the situation and act if required.
Meanwhile, nutters are killing civilians on our streets and the the argument about how to combat the problem is - to a greater or lesser extent - based around resources and funding. Both problems could be sorted in an instant by getting rid of Trident.
Agreed. I think I made a similar point in my previous post. A much better route than nuclear weapons.If N Korea needed to be taken down, the way to do it would be intelligence lead backed up by some kind of air armed force to neutralise and contain any attempted missile launches, whilst at the same time, take out by whatever means, the N Korean leadership.
Tim.